Almaty, Astana, Shymkent

Cyclophotocoagulation

from 145.000 ₸
Book an appointment

About the service

Cyclophotocoagulation lowers intraocular pressure in glaucoma by applying laser energy to the ciliary body. The doctor selects the treatment type and settings individually.

Who the service is for

Intraocular pressure

The indication is determined by the entire clinical picture rather than the stage alone: the type of glaucoma, current intraocular pressure, rate of progression, previous interventions and treatment goals. Patients whose IOP remains inadequately controlled despite tolerated glaucoma medication.

Intraocular pressure

After previous glaucoma surgery, the procedure may be considered if the target pressure has not been achieved or the effect has subsequently become insufficient.

Choosing the surgical approach

Patients in whom filtering or drainage surgery carries increased risk or is not preferred after informed discussion of alternatives.

Early detection of changes

For CW-TSCPC, particularly refractory or advanced disease, painful eyes and limited visual potential, while selected earlier scenarios may also occur.

Optic nerve

An ophthalmologist or glaucoma specialist should be consulted if intraocular pressure remains above the individual target despite treatment, visual-field or optic-nerve findings show progression, drops are poorly tolerated, the prescribed regimen is difficult to follow, or previous laser or surgical treatment has not provided sufficient control.

Limitations and safety

Seek urgent ophthalmic advice after treatment for rapidly increasing pain, sudden visual deterioration, marked redness, purulent discharge, severe photophobia or other rapidly worsening symptoms.

Book a consultation

Stages

Stage 1

Pretreatment assessment

Before the procedure, the doctor rechecks the diagnosis, intraocular pressure, anterior-segment condition and visual potential, and reviews medicines and previous operations.

Pretreatment assessment

Service benefits

Reduced fluid production

Treatment of the ciliary body helps reduce aqueous fluid production and lower pressure.

No drainage implant

Transscleral laser treatment does not require a drainage implant or creation of a filtering bleb.

An option in difficult cases

The method may be considered when other approaches do not adequately control pressure, including after previous surgery.

An option for repeat treatment

When indicated, the doctor may consider repeat laser treatment based on the response to the previous procedure.

Methods comparison

Criterion
CW-TSCPC
MP-TSCPC / MicroPulse TLT
Principle
Continuous energy with a coagulative effect on the ciliary body.
Short ON pulses separated by OFF intervals to permit partial tissue cooling.
Primary clinical goal
IOP reduction, commonly in complex and refractory disease.
IOP reduction with a less destructive treatment profile.
Typical indications
Refractory/advanced glaucoma, painful eyes, poor visual potential; selected other scenarios exist.
Broader range of glaucoma stages/types, including useful vision, failed prior surgery or high risk for incisional surgery.
Thermal load
Higher because energy is continuous.
Lower because of OFF intervals.
Coagulative effect
Pronounced cyclodestructive component.
Less pronounced with recommended dosing; MicroPulse TLT terminology is increasingly used.
Incision
No incision for transscleral treatment.
No incision for transscleral treatment.
Anaesthesia
Retrobulbar plus local anaesthesia.
Retrobulbar plus local anaesthesia.
Inflammation/hypotony risk
Higher, especially with more aggressive energy settings and severe baseline conditions.
Lower on average, but not zero.
Risk of visual loss
Clinically significant visual loss is possible.
Visual loss remains possible despite a generally better safety profile.
Retreatment
May be used when needed after reassessment.
Repeat treatment or another method is often required if the effect is insufficient.
Timing of effect
⬜ IOP is assessed over time rather than only immediately after treatment.
The response is also monitored over time.
Place in pathway
More often a later-line or complex-case intervention.
It may be used earlier, but selection depends on the evidence, the surgeon’s experience and the alternatives.
Versus filtering surgery
Does not create a new outflow pathway and is not a direct substitute for trabeculectomy or a tube.
Also not equivalent to filtering surgery and may not provide the required magnitude of IOP reduction in every case.
CW-TSCPC
Principle
Primary clinical goal
Typical indications
Thermal load
Coagulative effect
Incision
Anaesthesia
Inflammation/hypotony risk
Risk of visual loss
Retreatment
Timing of effect
Place in pathway
Versus filtering surgery
Continuous energy with a coagulative effect on the ciliary body.
IOP reduction, commonly in complex and refractory disease.
Refractory/advanced glaucoma, painful eyes, poor visual potential; selected other scenarios exist.
Higher because energy is continuous.
Pronounced cyclodestructive component.
No incision for transscleral treatment.
Retrobulbar plus local anaesthesia.
Higher, especially with more aggressive energy settings and severe baseline conditions.
Clinically significant visual loss is possible.
May be used when needed after reassessment.
⬜ IOP is assessed over time rather than only immediately after treatment.
More often a later-line or complex-case intervention.
Does not create a new outflow pathway and is not a direct substitute for trabeculectomy or a tube.
Short ON pulses separated by OFF intervals to permit partial tissue cooling.
IOP reduction with a less destructive treatment profile.
Broader range of glaucoma stages/types, including useful vision, failed prior surgery or high risk for incisional surgery.
Lower because of OFF intervals.
Less pronounced with recommended dosing; MicroPulse TLT terminology is increasingly used.
No incision for transscleral treatment.
Retrobulbar plus local anaesthesia.
Lower on average, but not zero.
Visual loss remains possible despite a generally better safety profile.
Repeat treatment or another method is often required if the effect is insufficient.
The response is also monitored over time.
It may be used earlier, but selection depends on the evidence, the surgeon’s experience and the alternatives.
Also not equivalent to filtering surgery and may not provide the required magnitude of IOP reduction in every case.

Book an appointment

Schedule a glaucoma consultation at KazRIED so the physician can evaluate your current IOP level, optic nerve status, and previous treatments.

Book an appointment

Procedure prices

Service name Price
Continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (per eye) from 145 000 ₸
Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (per eye) from 172 000 ₸
Our services, payable in installmentsTake care of your vision today and pay for our services in installments. Choose installment terms and a payment schedule that suit you.

Our doctors

A team of experienced doctors across specialties.

All doctorsThe full list of doctors is available here!

Cyclophotocoagulation: conventional and micropulse methods

Cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) is used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma. The laser targets the ciliary body, which lies behind the iris and contributes to aqueous humor production.

The goal is to achieve an individualized target IOP and reduce the risk of further optic nerve damage. The procedure does not restore nerve fibers that have already been lost.

How do conventional and micropulse modes differ?

Continuous-wave transscleral CPC (CW-TSCPC) delivers energy continuously, producing a pronounced coagulative effect. It can substantially reduce IOP but involves a greater thermal load and risks of inflammation, persistent hypotony, and rare severe complications.

Micropulse transscleral CPC (MP-TSCPC, MicroPulse TLT) alternates periods of energy delivery with pauses, allowing some heat to dissipate.

Its effects are associated with changes in ciliary body function, reduced aqueous humor production, and potentially enhanced alternative outflow.

Comparative studies report a more favorable safety profile for MP-TSCPC for several complications. However, IOP reduction and the need for retreatment depend on treatment settings, baseline pressure, and the clinical situation.

Micropulse treatment is not risk-free and does not guarantee freedom from eye drops.

When is the procedure considered?

Micropulse CPC may be discussed when medications are poorly tolerated, maximally tolerated medical therapy is insufficient, previous surgery has provided inadequate control, or other surgery carries a high risk.

It may be considered at different stages and in different forms of glaucoma, but indications are individualized. In angle-closure, neovascular, uveitic, and other secondary or refractory glaucomas, management depends on the cause of IOP elevation.

If pressure can be safely controlled with drops, SLT, or another intervention, CPC is not necessarily the next step.

Which clinical situations influence the choice?

  • Open-angle glaucoma with IOP above target despite several medications: progression and angle anatomy are assessed before comparing SLT, surgery, and MP-TSCPC.
  • Pressure rises after drainage surgery: device position and function, medications, and eye condition are reviewed before considering MP-TSCPC or another intervention.
  • Painful end-stage glaucoma with limited visual potential: treatment may aim to control pain and pressure. CW-TSCPC may have a palliative role.
  • Useful vision with a high surgical risk: micropulse CPC is compared with other options according to the expected IOP reduction and acceptable risk.

What is assessed before treatment?

The clinician considers glaucoma type and stage, target IOP, optic nerve condition, the retinal nerve fiber layer, visual field, anterior chamber angle, and eye anatomy.

Visual potential, inflammation, coexisting conditions, medication tolerance, and previous SLT, filtering surgery, or drainage implants are also important.

Expected effects, risks, and the likelihood of retreatment are discussed separately for conventional and micropulse modes. Pressure reduction percentages in promotional materials do not guarantee an individual outcome.

How is the procedure organized?

Conventional and micropulse transscleral CPC are performed on an outpatient basis. The source description gives an average duration of up to 20 minutes; individual arrangements should be confirmed before treatment.

Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation is not included among the procedures performed in the service described.

What if pressure remains above target?

The same procedure should not be repeated automatically. The clinician first assesses the effect achieved, tolerability, medications, and reasons for inadequate control.

Further management may include repeat MP-TSCPC, another laser approach, filtering surgery, a drainage device, or a combination of methods.

Follow-up after CPC

Glaucoma remains a chronic disease even after a good initial response. Follow-up monitors IOP, medications, the optic nerve, OCT findings, and visual fields.

The absence of pain or other symptoms does not establish that pressure is safe. Examination findings and clinical assessment determine follow-up timing.

Do not stop pressure-lowering drops independently. The clinician may initially maintain the previous regimen and then adjust it according to the actual IOP response and inflammation.

A diminishing effect over time does not necessarily mean treatment failure. Monitoring helps determine whether current control is sufficient or an additional intervention is needed.

Facts and offers

Kazakhstan’s first specialized ophthalmology institute, operating since 1933.

Modern diagnostics and surgery using world-class equipment.

Leading ophthalmologists in Kazakhstan, scientists and experienced surgeons.

More than 30,000 operations and around 270,000 consultations annually.

Related services

Frequently asked questions

What is cyclophotocoagulation?
Cyclophotocoagulation, or CPC, is a glaucoma laser treatment designed to lower intraocular pressure by applying laser energy in the region of the ciliary body. In transscleral treatment, energy is delivered through the outer wall of the eye without creating a new filtering pathway.
How does continuous-wave CPC differ from micropulse treatment?
Continuous-wave TSCPC delivers uninterrupted laser energy during each application and produces a more pronounced coagulative effect. MicroPulse TLT alternates energy delivery with off periods, reducing continuous thermal exposure of surrounding tissues.
Are micropulse CPC and MicroPulse TLT the same treatment?
MicroPulse TLT, or MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Therapy, is now widely used to describe micropulse transscleral glaucoma laser treatment. The term MP-TSCPC is also encountered in medical literature.
Can cyclophotocoagulation cure glaucoma?
No. CPC aims to lower intraocular pressure and reduce the risk of further optic nerve damage. It generally cannot restore established glaucomatous damage or visual-field loss.
When may CPC be recommended?
CPC may be considered when IOP remains above the individual target despite tolerated treatment, after inadequate response to previous procedures or when other operations have an unfavourable risk-benefit profile. Indications depend on glaucoma type and severity.

Confirm you are not a robot

Complete the check to send your request.